Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
2010-10-11 09:19:05 UTC
Here's another very interesting study comparing the following
1. Exercise with weight loss
2. Exercise without weight loss (they ate more)
3. Weight loss from calorie restriction and no exercise
4. Control.
a.The Exercise/Weight loss group lost the most viseral fat.
b. The Exercise/Weight loss group livers decrease glucose production
Alot more than the other groups.
It seems that exrecising and reducing calories are atleast not
increasing them has very potent efffects for diabetics.
This should put a stop to those that minimize the importance of
exercise. Oh, sorry I forgot nobody says this.
Actually they do (Susan said this in the past) and its in the
archieves.
Randy
http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/94/11/4258
The Impact of Exercise Training Compared to Caloric Restriction on
Hepatic and Peripheral Insulin Resistance in Obesity
Robert H. Coker, Rick H. Williams, Sophie E. Yeo, Patrick M.
Kortebein, Don L. Bodenner, Philip A. Kern and William J. Evans
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (R.H.C.), and the
Departments of Geriatrics (R.H.C., R.H.W., S.E.Y., D.L.B., W.J.E.) and
Medicine (P.A.K.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little
Rock, Arkansas 72205
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Robert H.
Coker, Ph.D., Nutrition, Metabolism, and Exercise Laboratory, Donald
W. Reynolds Institute on Aging, 4301 W. Markham, Slot 806, University
Context: It has been difficult to distinguish the independent effects
of caloric restriction versus exercise training on insulin
resistance.
Objective: Utilizing metabolic feeding and supervised exercise
training, we examined the influence of caloric restriction vs.
exercise training with and without weight loss on hepatic and
peripheral insulin resistance.
Design, Participants, and Intervention: Thirty-four obese, older
subjects were randomized to: caloric restriction with weight loss
(CR), exercise training with weight loss (EWL), exercise training
without weight loss (EX), or controls. Based on an equivalent caloric
deficit in EWL and CR, we induced matched weight loss. Subjects in the
EX group received caloric compensation. Combined with [6,62H2]glucose,
an octreotide, glucagon, multistage insulin infusion was performed to
determine suppression of glucose production (SGP) and insulin-
stimulated glucose disposal (ISGD). Computed tomography scans were
performed to assess changes in fat distribution.
Results: Body weight decreased similarly in EWL and CR, and did not
change in EX and controls. The reduction in visceral fat was
significantly greater in EWL (–71 ± 15 cm2) compared to CR and EX. The
increase in SGP was also almost 3-fold greater (27 ± 2%) in EWL. EWL
and CR promoted similar improvements in ISGD [+2.5 ± 0.4 and 2.4 ± 0.9
mg · kg fat-free mass (FFM)–1 · min–1], respectively.
Conclusions: EWL promoted the most significant reduction in visceral
fat and the greatest improvement in SGP. Equivalent increases in ISGD
were noted in EWL and CR, whereas EX provided a modest improvement.
Based on our results, EWL promoted the optimal intervention-based
changes in body fat distribution and systemic insulin resistance.
Smarter to hold to the right daily amount (32 oz) of food to lose the1. Exercise with weight loss
2. Exercise without weight loss (they ate more)
3. Weight loss from calorie restriction and no exercise
4. Control.
a.The Exercise/Weight loss group lost the most viseral fat.
b. The Exercise/Weight loss group livers decrease glucose production
Alot more than the other groups.
It seems that exrecising and reducing calories are atleast not
increasing them has very potent efffects for diabetics.
This should put a stop to those that minimize the importance of
exercise. Oh, sorry I forgot nobody says this.
Actually they do (Susan said this in the past) and its in the
archieves.
Randy
http://jcem.endojournals.org/cgi/content/abstract/94/11/4258
The Impact of Exercise Training Compared to Caloric Restriction on
Hepatic and Peripheral Insulin Resistance in Obesity
Robert H. Coker, Rick H. Williams, Sophie E. Yeo, Patrick M.
Kortebein, Don L. Bodenner, Philip A. Kern and William J. Evans
Central Arkansas Veterans Healthcare System (R.H.C.), and the
Departments of Geriatrics (R.H.C., R.H.W., S.E.Y., D.L.B., W.J.E.) and
Medicine (P.A.K.), University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little
Rock, Arkansas 72205
Address all correspondence and requests for reprints to: Robert H.
Coker, Ph.D., Nutrition, Metabolism, and Exercise Laboratory, Donald
W. Reynolds Institute on Aging, 4301 W. Markham, Slot 806, University
Context: It has been difficult to distinguish the independent effects
of caloric restriction versus exercise training on insulin
resistance.
Objective: Utilizing metabolic feeding and supervised exercise
training, we examined the influence of caloric restriction vs.
exercise training with and without weight loss on hepatic and
peripheral insulin resistance.
Design, Participants, and Intervention: Thirty-four obese, older
subjects were randomized to: caloric restriction with weight loss
(CR), exercise training with weight loss (EWL), exercise training
without weight loss (EX), or controls. Based on an equivalent caloric
deficit in EWL and CR, we induced matched weight loss. Subjects in the
EX group received caloric compensation. Combined with [6,62H2]glucose,
an octreotide, glucagon, multistage insulin infusion was performed to
determine suppression of glucose production (SGP) and insulin-
stimulated glucose disposal (ISGD). Computed tomography scans were
performed to assess changes in fat distribution.
Results: Body weight decreased similarly in EWL and CR, and did not
change in EX and controls. The reduction in visceral fat was
significantly greater in EWL (–71 ± 15 cm2) compared to CR and EX. The
increase in SGP was also almost 3-fold greater (27 ± 2%) in EWL. EWL
and CR promoted similar improvements in ISGD [+2.5 ± 0.4 and 2.4 ± 0.9
mg · kg fat-free mass (FFM)–1 · min–1], respectively.
Conclusions: EWL promoted the most significant reduction in visceral
fat and the greatest improvement in SGP. Equivalent increases in ISGD
were noted in EWL and CR, whereas EX provided a modest improvement.
Based on our results, EWL promoted the optimal intervention-based
changes in body fat distribution and systemic insulin resistance.
visceral adipose tissue (VAT) that increases risk of injury during
exercise and http://WDJW.net/NotDiet
Yes, right amount (omer) control as Chris Malcolm is doing is much
more sophisticated and smarter:
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.support.diet.low-carb/msg/8d2ef74488074acf?
Be hungrier, which really is healthier especially for diabetics and
other heart disease patients:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9642aafa0aad16eb?
We do this by weighing our meals per the http://WDJW.net/2PD-OMER
Approach to get our...
http://WDJW.net/Status
and then...
http://WDJW.net/Update
so that there will be...
http://WDJW.net/NoVAT
Being hungry is truly wonderful as proven by four lines of evidence:
Mathematical:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31113247&l=9583a55b45&id=1467768946
Historical:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31113078&l=0071d60632&id=1467768946
Medical:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31107542&l=a51ee83a50&id=1467768946
Psychological:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31229810&l=0b3a2ad60b&id=1467768946
So that we really should http://WDJW.net/BeHungry and say we are
"wonderfully hungry" whenever we are greeted:
http://www.facebook.com/photo.php?pid=31113612&l=cbe72c46ca&id=1467768946
There is pure joy in being used by GOD to convince others:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/8824c8a5b7c7518c?
"A 2005 visit to an Atlanta cardiologist by the name of Andrew Chung
put me on some serious reality
I wasnt just chubby or husky, I am what they often call morbidly
obese. He explained that morbid obesity simply means that if something
happened to me that could be attiributed to weight and I were to end
up in the not breathing state
ok some call it DEAD
that a doctor could simply dismiss it as natural causes related to
weight more or less.
Ive been told I was a chunky fella a couple times, maybe even fat...
but not quite that harshly. Definitely made me think about a few
things, as much as I dislike scare tactics when it comes to health.
Well in the midst of the shock treatment, he also had me come to a
heart wellness seminar that he does on some Saturdays in Mableton.
Nice little get together, he has folks from the community come in and
discuss Tai Chi, exercises, testimonials, all kinds of good stuff.
Then he shows the movie SUPERSIZE ME to set up the pitch for his 2PD
Omer approach that he has his patients use to lose weight.
In a nutshell, in his view, HOW MUCH you eat is more of the issue than
WHAT you eat and portion is more important than any fat content or
calories.
I agree with this. This is why I have always been more successful on
more liquid diets (cabbage soup, slimfast, herbalife (tho dangerous))
than anything else. I wasnt eating the portions I was before that..."
Source:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/e82824a99ba4f187?
Love in the truth,
Andrew <><
--
Andrew B. Chung, MD/PhD
Board-certified Cardiologist
and Author of the 2PD-OMER Approach:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.med.cardiology/msg/9ad0c19df5ffc2f7?